A place to ask questions, connect with others, and stay in the know
Hi there, I have been cross referencing the canned reports of my agents and call center and i am finding that there is a large discrepancy between the reports, specifically the agent interactions report, the agent metrics report and the supervisor/ agents dashboard.
Given that the reporting is so critical to running an effective contact center is there a way for a greater emphasis to be put on the improvement and development of an accurate reporting model.
Currently i am seeing variances of up to 3min in AHT between reports, which in our business equates to 1.5 extra persons needed or not needed in the center.
Is anyone else seeing such differences? I have loaded a support ticket (2/15/17) and am still waiting on a response.
Hi @Jason Pratt,
I reached out to development and support about this, and they are investigating.
We are experiencing the same thing with reports. We also find that calls offered does not always equal calls answered + abandoned, and we are not set up to have calls flow out, or use voicemail.
One thing we found out recently is that AHT is based on the interaction and not the agent, and while not ideal, this has helped explain why staff are having difficulties maintaining consistent AHT results.
@Jason Pratt - have you gotten a response to your support ticket? If you give me your company name, I can follow up (and post a response here, too).
Hello @Rebecca Gibson My company is Noosa Shire Council. i have raised a couple of tickets about a month ago which are still in investigation. thanks you.
Hi, experiencing same issue, was this resolved/how?
I am also curious on how this was resolved. I am noticing discrepancies as well.
@Matthew Smedick @Radek Bily There was a resolution to my ticket that i raised regarding the discrepancies. The dashboard information is matching closer to metric reports run for the same period now. They are still out but only by minimal amounts (a few seconds and a few calls). The ticket is still open and under investigation to find the root cause of it. Perhaps if you are having a similar issue raise a ticket also with screenshots of the discrepancy and hopefully they can resolve quickly.
We have also raised this issue and we are trying to reproduce it in a test IVR to see which scenario is causing the discrepancies in the reports.
Interested to read some of these responses, we too are not entirely convinced that the Reports are showing accurate data. Recently the reporting team told me that we need 7 FTE's based on current reports. Our biggest concern is the definition of an Abandoned Call.
I will be watching this thread carefully
Our reports has been much better since we got version 220.127.116.1142 on our Edges. But we are not fully convinced that it's 100% correct yet.
What do you mean with definition of abandoned calls @Lee Jacques ? In the definition it says that a abandoned call is that caller entered the queue, but disconnected before they reached an agent.
So what is the best report to run which will show us the number of calls abandoned .
Abandoned = yy
QUEUE = MY-PHONE-Q
Every year, Genesys® delivers more than 70 billion remarkable customer experiences for organizations in over 100 countries. Through the power of the cloud and AI, our technology connects every customer moment across marketing, sales and service on any channel, while also improving employee experiences. Genesys pioneered Experience as a ServiceSM so organizations of any size can provide true personalization at scale, interact with empathy, and foster customer trust and loyalty. This is enabled by Genesys Cloud™, an all-in-one solution and the world's leading public cloud contact center platform, designed for rapid innovation, scalability and flexibility. Visit www.genesys.com.