Coming from an Avaya system recently and having used it on both sides, I do miss seeing the flexibility for the business. While we didn't use the full range of 1-16 with Avaya, we would put people on a level 16 to indicate that while they could assist with the queue, they knew they were a last resort. Typically we'd do this if we wanted them working on off phone work, but still available to take a call if a queue got really busy.
That being said, I'm not sure if 1-100 is needed, but I could see a rating system of 1-20 to offer some flexibility with skilling. I'll definitely vote on the idea though.
------------------------------
Seean Weaver
MAPFRE USA - Telecom Analyst
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 08-21-2024 15:23
From: Shane Jenkins
Subject: Skilling - Is anyone dealing w the need for more than the 0 to 5 star skill levels? How have you approached this challenge?
Hi all,
We are migrating from Genesys PureConnect to Genesys Cloud FedRAMP. Within PureConnect, we could set skill levels from 1-100 for agents or workgroups. Within Genesys Cloud we have the 5 star system and appears we have 0 to 5 for available skill levels, so 6 total. Quite the difference. With that said, we actually have a need for more than 10 skill levels as we have one customer that has more than 10 queues and they want to be able to stagger agents skilling for each queue, but since we're limited, we cannot do this w skill rating alone.
I found an idea linked below that requested additional skill level settings.
Question for the board, are any of you running into the need for more than the 0-5 star rating system for skilling? If so, how are you dealing with that scenario? Are you combining priority with skill to give more options or maybe stacking skills? Curious what approaches you have tried.
Thanks in advance!
https://genesyscloud.ideas.aha.io/ideas/INB-I-731
#ArchitectureandDesign
#Roadmap/NewFeatures
#Routing(ACD/IVR)
#SystemAdministration
------------------------------
Shane
------------------------------