Legacy Dev Forum Posts

 View Only

Sign Up

  • 1.  MLTS implementation

    Posted 06-05-2025 18:41

    Santiago | 2020-03-26 14:05:31 UTC | #1

    Hi,

    Genesys has asked to use MLTS for the data action (https://help.mypurecloud.com/articles/mtls-support-for-data-actions/) for which it has provided a .pem certificate.

    I need to know how to install that certificate on an IIS server since when I try to install it it asks me for a private key which I don't have. Also, IIS installs certificates in .pfx format, so I don't know the procedure for Genesys .pem file.

    Any help is too much Regards


    Jason_Mathison | 2020-03-26 18:39:51 UTC | #2

    To setup IIS to verify the certificate that is provided by a Data Action, I don't think that you need to do anything more than add the .pem file to the trusted root certificate area of certificate management. In windows 10 I was able to do that by

    1. Hit start -> type in certmgr -> Start Manage Computer Certificates
    2. Right Click on "Trusted Root Certification Authorities" -> All Tasks -> Import
    3. Clicking the file type dropdown in the lower right and choosing "all files (.)"
    4. Import the certificate.

    Another option is to rename the .pem file to .crt. Windows will now recognize the file as a certificate, and you right click -> import certificate.

    Two things to note: First, you are adding the ability for IIS to trust connections from the Data Action Service. This means that we are not providing a private certificate to you, only the public side of the Certificate Authority that generates certificates for Data Actions. That is a long-winded way of saying that you should not be asked for a private certificate as part of setting this up. Second, Genesys added support for MTLS as several customers requested it. While it is a great added layer of protection, it is not required, nor it is likely something we would ever require our customers to implement.

    --Jason


    Santiago | 2020-03-26 21:07:53 UTC | #3

    Thanks Jason for sharing your answer, it has been very valuable. Another question, what would be the correct way to validate that the certificate is correctly installed?


    Jason_Mathison | 2020-03-27 12:42:46 UTC | #4

    A reasonable approach to me would be to first have a data action working in test mode as well as having a tool like postman setup to directly hit your endpoint.

    Setup the certificate.

    Verify that the data action continues to work in test mode. Verify that the endpoint now requires a certificate when accessed directly.

    [Edited to remove the idea of using the IIS capability to map a certificate to a user. The Data Action certificate can change at any time, so this is a terrible idea.]


    Santiago | 2020-03-28 14:40:40 UTC | #5

    I performed the tests with the data action, but I never had a requirement for a certificate, but with or without a certificate the data actions worked fine.


    Jason_Mathison | 2020-03-30 01:31:02 UTC | #6

    If everything is setup correctly you shouldn't need to do anything with the data action to get MTLS to work. If you attempt to hit the route with a tool like postman I would expect that it would ask you about a certificate. Actually, if you just try to connect to the endpoint with a web browser it should ask about a certificate.

    If you can give me the name of your data action I should be able to tell if your endpoint is requesting MTLS. You can grab the name from the URL when you are editing/testing it, it should be something like custom-111111-2222-3333-4444-555555555555.


    Santiago | 2020-03-31 19:32:30 UTC | #7

    Of course you would help me a lot, I send you what you requested: custom-7c4a8717-1911-49e5-ac17-27702083c03a


    Jason_Mathison | 2020-03-31 19:51:08 UTC | #8

    What I can see is that you executed that action 1 time, at around 12:30 today. According to our metrics your endpoint did request a Client Certificate and the Data Action was successful (returned a 200). It appears that everything is working correctly for you.

    --Jason


    Jason_Mathison | 2020-04-01 14:08:33 UTC | #9

    I went back and rechecked this because I realized if you were testing this action it would return 200 even if there was an error. Your endpoint did return a 200, so that was fine. One other thing I noticed is that the endpoint took 12.5 seconds to respond, which for some applications is a really long time.


    system | 2020-05-02 14:08:16 UTC | #10

    This topic was automatically closed 31 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.


    This post was migrated from the old Developer Forum.

    ref: 7409