A lot of customers still prefer to let agents manually answer calls rather than auto answer...which is probably not why Off is the default.
Honestly, it may very well be a carry-over from back in the day when a Persistent Connection involved a land-line phone and there was a cost associated with maintaining an open line for a remote agent phone (which is similar to WebRTC in that the system places a call to the phone when setting up the connection rather than the phone establishing a connection to the system).
Just my .02
------------------------------
George Ganahl GCCX-AI, GCP, GCSME
Technical Adoption Champion
Genesys
2024 Community Member of the Year
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 09-03-2025 18:19
From: Dave Halderman
Subject: Pros and cons of persistent WebRTC connection
I just read the Resource Center page related to persistent connections for WebRTC phones. From what I read there, it sounds like a really good idea. Why is that setting off by default, though? I assume there's a reason. I searched through the forum and found a few discussions about the feature, but I didn't come up with any real good list of why you would or wouldn't want to enable it. We use auto-answer for nearly all queues. We're seeing occasional Alert No Answers and sometimes even a 'station not responding' message from the desktop app. This has me thinking that persistent WebRTC connections might be helpful.
Are there downsides? Are there certain scenarios where it's better not to enable it?
#SIP/VoIP
#Telephony
#Unsure/Other
------------------------------
Dave Halderman
Business Analyst
------------------------------