Legacy Dev Forum Posts

 View Only

Sign Up

Web Messenger - Conversation Auto Start

  • 1.  Web Messenger - Conversation Auto Start

    Posted 06-05-2025 18:36

    78692638d4a24645fbf5 | 2022-09-15 19:38:50 UTC | #1

    Hello,

    I am testing Web Messenger with the conversation Auto Start feature enabled on my web messenger configuration. I also am testing in an environment with the Web Messenger threading timeline set to 0. The documentation states that " Under Automatically Start Conversations , select whether to allow automatic start of conversations. When this feature is turned On , conversations are initiated automatically, when the end-user expands the Messenger window."

    This works excellently when I initiate a web messaging interaction the first time - the auto start sends the message. Then, the customer can interact with the agent and disconnect. However, I'm having trouble understanding when conversation auto start will "re-trigger", when the customer comes back to the web messaging widget. I've noticed that after the conversation disconnects, and the customer minimizes the widget, then re-opens the widget.. conversation auto-start does not initiate.

    Could you please help me understand how the widget knows when it should auto-start?

    Thanks,


    Angelo_Cicchitto | 2022-09-16 09:44:49 UTC | #2

    Hello. Your observation is correct: at the moment, auto-start will trigger only for brand new "Guest" sessions (which are completely unrelated to threading timeline). The object is to capture end-user's initial attention and engagement. Once the Guest session is started, the auto-start will not apply anymore, as the assumption is that end-user is already aware of the ongoing async conversation. We may expand logic in future, based on use-cases and customer demand. Once the Guest session expires (after 72 hours of inactivity), the auto-start logic will reset.


    system | 2022-10-16 09:44:58 UTC | #3

    This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.


    This post was migrated from the old Developer Forum.

    ref: 16313