100% on your assessment - especially the last "Since there is no consequence to the agent in choosing the wrong status, there is also no incentive for them to do so." part.
We do have customers that simply want a black and white view of On Queue and then one bucket for everything else. I would say it is not very common in practice that customers will have this option enabled. To be honest I think some of those performance managers that get evaluated/compensated on adherence numbers like to play games (activity equivalency, ignoring certain scheduled activities for adherence, changing schedules in arrears, etc.) to artificially boost those numbers. Similar to those that want to have all, not just short, abandons removed from service level calculations.
------------------------------
Jay Langsford
VP, R&D
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 07-27-2024 13:03
From: Gina Palmer
Subject: Activity Equivalency - MU Setting
Hi @Garrett Gardner For me, having the Activity Equivalency on makes monitoring shrinkage much more difficult because you can't guarantee the accuracy in the the status reports. You may wonder why your SL is bad and look at the status time to see that it is because there are too many Coachings happening when, in actuality, agents were off queue for personal time (that is our restroom code). Since there is no consequence to the agent in choosing the wrong status, there is also no incentive for them to do so.
------------------------------
Gina Palmer
Manager, Workforce Management
Papa, Inc.
------------------------------