Hello, Leticia.
In the specific case you described, I would recommend keeping the historical data from the marketing campaigns in the dataset used for forecasting.
In this scenario, we know that the 40% increase on Tuesdays is directly linked to marketing campaigns and has occurred over the last four weeks. This indicates that it is not a random event, but rather a behavior that may be becoming a recurring pattern.
My decision would depend primarily on a few criteria:
- Does the company intend to continue running these campaigns?
- Is it possible to know in advance when the campaign will take place?
If the answer to these questions is yes, I would treat these Tuesdays as a business pattern and keep the data in the forecast, or use system features such as forecast adjustments.
The expected impact of this decision is improved forecast accuracy. If I ignore a pattern that will continue to occur, the forecast for Tuesdays will likely be underestimated, resulting in understaffing and a drop in service levels. Conversely, if I incorporate an event that will not recur, the forecast will be overestimated, leading to excess capacity and unnecessary costs.
That is why I believe a forecast should combine statistical analysis with business insight. Historical data is important, but understanding the operational context is what allows us to decide whether an event should be treated as an exception or as a new pattern.
------------------------------
Lilian Masselli
-
------------------------------