Genesys Cloud - Main

 View Only

Sign Up

  • 1.  Progressive Campaigns: Call Analysis vs. Connection Delay

    Posted 4 hours ago

    Hi everyone,

    I'm supporting the deployment of several progressive campaigns for a high-volume customer service contact center.

    The business previously used an on-premises Presence solution and is accustomed to outbound calls being connected to an agent almost immediately after the contact answers. They do have some level of voicemail detection in place, so I suspect the platform performs basic call analysis; however, it does not appear to introduce any noticeable connection delay.

    During our initial testing of Genesys call analysis, we observed a 4-5 second delay between the contact answering the call and the call being connected to an agent. Understandably, that delay is not acceptable to our stakeholders.

    I've been testing different call analysis configurations and have a question for those with experience in this area:

    If I disable Post-Connect Analysis (PCA) and Answering Machine Detection (AMD), will Genesys still be able to identify voicemails based on tones and audio paths, or will disabling those features remove voicemail detection capabilities altogether?

    Thank you in advance for any guidance or lessons learned!


    #Outbound
    #PredictiveEngagement/Routing
    #Telephony

    ------------------------------
    Cody Kartarik
    Sr. Workforce Management Analyst
    She/Her/Hers
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Progressive Campaigns: Call Analysis vs. Connection Delay

    Posted 3 hours ago

    You could set Beep Detection but that would depend on the contacts setup. In the UK I worked for a mobile provider that added beeps to the calls when they routed to voicemail purely for supporting their dialler. I am not sure how wide the process of playing a beep for voicemail etc is but you could look at that as a potential quick fix. Another feature we played with was to allow the agent to transfer a voicemail call via a scripted button. In that case we routed the call to an outbound flow to detect silence i.e. If a customer does not say anything in x seconds then do y. It was setup to play an automated You were called today...  response. I know it means that agents would get voicemail calls but once they know its a voicemail they can transfer it mod flow and the outbound part will wait until there is x seconds of silence then play the message. Not sure where this is for but in the UK the rules and fines are very strict and high so the pain of having voicemails handled by the agent was less than the potential fines as the call has to be handled within 1 second of being answered.



    ------------------------------
    lee
    Solution Architect
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Progressive Campaigns: Call Analysis vs. Connection Delay

    Posted 2 hours ago

    Thank you very much for your detailed response and suggestions, Lee!

    Beep Detection and enabling Transfer to Outbound Flow could certainly reduce the number of voicemails that would trickle through to the agents and increase efficiency by enabling them to quickly transfer them to a flow when received. I'll explore both these options and get feedback from my stakeholders!

    Thanks again; tremendously helpful! 



    ------------------------------
    Cody Kartarik
    Sr. Workforce Management Analyst
    She/Her/Hers
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Progressive Campaigns: Call Analysis vs. Connection Delay

    Posted 3 hours ago

    Hi Cody,

    From what I understand, the main trade-off here is less about platform stability and more about how much call classification you are willing to sacrifice in exchange for faster agent connection.

    The 4–5 second delay you are seeing can indeed be related to the post-connect analysis performed before Genesys decides whether the answering party is a live person, voicemail/answering machine, fax, etc.

    One important distinction is that disabling AMD is not exactly the same as disabling Post-Connect Call Analysis (PCA).

    If you disable Answering Machine Detection, Genesys stops using the general speech-based AMD mechanism, but tone and audio-print detection can still remain available. According to the Genesys documentation, this can significantly reduce the time required to classify a call while still identifying a meaningful portion of answering machines through those other mechanisms.

    On the other hand, if you disable Post-Connect Call Analysis, AMD is also disabled and Genesys no longer waits for post-connect events such as live voice, machine, busy, or fax classification. That provides the fastest connection path, but the functional trade-off is that more voicemail/recorded-message scenarios may reach the agent.

    So I would probably test this progressively rather than immediately disabling everything:

    1. Keep PCA enabled and test Adjustable Live Speaker Detection (ALSD), starting with Low or Medium.

    2. If the delay is still unacceptable, test PCA enabled + AMD disabled.

    3. Only then test PCA disabled, understanding that this effectively prioritizes connection speed over post-connect classification.

    There is another part of the call path that may also be worth checking: how the interaction is delivered to the agent after the call has already been classified.

    The queue's Alerting Timeout itself is not a delay Genesys intentionally adds before delivering the call. It is simply the amount of time an agent has to answer an offered interaction before being placed into Not Responding and the interaction is routed again.

    What can remove that agent-answer step is Auto Answer.

    For progressive outbound queues, enabling Auto Answer at the queue level can be particularly useful because the interaction can connect automatically as soon as an available agent is selected, without requiring the agent to manually accept it. I would prefer configuring this at the queue level rather than changing agent behavior globally, especially if those agents also handle inbound interactions.

    I would also verify two additional items:

    • Persistent Connection, if applicable to the phones/endpoints being used, as this can reduce the time required to establish the agent-side media path for each new outbound call.

    • Whisper Audio on the queue. If a whisper prompt is configured, two-way communication with the customer does not begin until that prompt finishes, so a few seconds of whisper audio can sometimes look exactly like a call-analysis delay.

    So, for troubleshooting, I would break the 4–5 seconds into stages:

    Call answered → PCA/AMD/ALSD → ACD routing → agent alerting/Auto Answer → whisper → media connection

    That should help determine whether the entire delay is really being introduced by AMD/PCA or whether part of it is occurring after Genesys has already classified the call.

    I would be very interested to see the timings from each of those test combinations, because for a high-volume progressive campaign, PCA enabled + AMD disabled or ALSD tuning may be a better compromise than completely disabling post-connect analysis.



    ------------------------------
    Fernando Sotto dos Santos
    Consultor de Atendimento Senior Grupo Casas Bahia
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: Progressive Campaigns: Call Analysis vs. Connection Delay

    Posted 2 hours ago

    Hi, @Cody Kartarik

    This is a very interesting case. In the campaigns I've implemented, I've never noticed such a high delay.

    One quick question. Was this 4–5 second delay you identified specifically at the detection point?

    I took a look at the documentation, and disabling PCA also disables AMD. However, about two-thirds of calls to answering machines already recognized by the platform are still prevented.

    Out of curiosity, which region are these campaigns operating in?



    ------------------------------
    Jhonatan Engel
    ------------------------------