Question: Bulls-eye Routing Behavior in Contact Center – Call Skipping Ring 2
Hi Community,
I'm trying to understand the behavior of bulls-eye routing in a contact center setup and would appreciate your insights.
Setup:
I have 4 agents, each with a Contact Center license and user role.
| Agent |
Skill |
Proficiency |
| 1 |
customer_skill |
* |
| 2 |
customer_skill |
** |
| 3 |
customer_skill |
*** |
| 4 |
No skill assigned |
- |
Flow Configuration:
Queue Settings:
-
Routing method: Bulls-eye routing
-
Rings:
-
Ring 1: Agent 1, Agent 4
-
Ring 2: Agent 2
-
Ring 3: Agent 3
-
Ring timeout: 5 seconds per ring
-
Routing evaluation: Best available skill
Problem:
Based on my understanding:
-
The call should first go to Ring 1 (Agent 1 and Agent 4).
-
Since Agent 4 has no skill, only Agent 1 should be considered.
-
If Agent 1 doesn't answer within 5 seconds, the call should go to Ring 2 (Agent 2), and if not answered, then to Ring 3 (Agent 3).
However, during testing:
-
The call correctly rings Agent 1 first.
-
But if Agent 1 doesn't answer, instead of going to Agent 2 (Ring 2), it jumps directly to Agent 3 (Ring 3).
Question:
Why is the call skipping Ring 2 and routing directly to Ring 3?
Is this expected behavior when using "Best available skill" evaluation?
Is there any priority being given to skill proficiency over ring sequence?
Thanks in advance for your help!
#Routing(ACD/IVR)------------------------------
Balram Dodiya
------------------------------