Legacy Dev Forum Posts

 View Only

Sign Up

Unable to pull the Error details from the response payload received from Integration API request

  • 1.  Unable to pull the Error details from the response payload received from Integration API request

    Posted 06-05-2025 18:44

    Harsha_Shenoy | 2023-04-10 20:08:58 UTC | #1

    In case of any wrong input in the request or issue at the Oauth app/Mulesoft side, a response payload with error details is sent by Oauthapp/Mulesoft Action, we want to capture the errors >> message ("errors": [ { "message": "REST call for action execute failed. Message: Request to backend service failed. Response from web service:... [...]".")

    We have the following Failure outputs captured for the data action in architect, but none of them captures the one above mentioned. errorCode Status correlationID entityId entityName userMessage userParamsMessage userParams.key userParams.value details.errorCode details.fieldName details.entityId details.entityName

    Following is the sample failure response from oauthapp/Mulesoft -

    We checked with Mulesoft integration team and found out that they are sending or have access to update and send only the following -

    {

    "errorStatus": "BAD Request",

    "errorDescription": "HTTP POST on resource 'https://api-XXX... failed: bad request (400).",

    "responsePayload": {

    "errorStatus": "BAD Request",

    "errorDescription": "HTTP POST on resource 'https://xxxxx failed: bad request (400).",

    "transactionId": "0009e3e7-dc9a-45fa-a092-004af2cdd4e6",

    "correlationId": "d2325280-ad22-11ed-9fca-02f6253c9acf",

    "suggested-action": "Please check your request."

    },

    "transactionId": "d2325280-ad22-11ed-9fca-02f6253c9acf",

    "correlationId": "d2325280-ad22-11ed-9fca-02f6253c9acf",

    "suggested-action": "Please check your request."

    }

    in Genesys cloud we see additional structure, following (also underlined the mulesoft response)-

    {

    "message": "The request could not be understood by the server due to malformed syntax.",

    "code": "bad.request",

    "status": 400,

    "messageParams": {},

    "contextId": "2955bc8c-3832-4b5b-90fd-6b555701c5d1",

    "details": [

    {

    "errorCode": "ACTION.REMOTE_ENDPOINT"

    }

    ],

    "errors": [

    {

    "message": "REST call for action execute failed. Message: Request to backend service failed. Response from web service: {\n "errorStatus": "BAD Request",\n "errorDescription": "HTTP POST on resource 'https://api-XXX' failed: bad request (400).",\n "responsePayload": {\n "errorStatus": "BAD Request",\n "errorDescription": "HTTP POST on resource 'https://xxxxx' failed: bad request (400).",\n "transactionId": "54f82daa-1abd-4e67-8b2e-c54c0fad0cf5",\n "correlationId": "ae986530-9cb5-11ed-882e-06d2ff753015",\n "suggested-action": "Please check your request."\n },\n "transactionId": "ae986530-9cb5-11ed-882e-06d2ff753015",\n "correlationId": "ae986530-9cb5-11ed-882e-06d2ff753015",\n "suggested-action": "Please check your request."\n} [2955bc8c-3832-4b5b-90fd-6b555701c5d1]",

    "code": "BAD_REQUEST",

    "status": 400,

    "messageParams": {},

    "details": [],

    "errors": []

    }

    ]

    We are unable to capture the response from Mulesoft, in Architect data action block, we see the following kvps in failure path of data action block -

    errorCode

    Status

    correlationID

    entityId

    entityName

    userMessage

    userParamsMessage

    userParams.key

    userParams.value

    details.errorCode

    details.fieldName

    details.entityId

    details.entityName

    and following is the mapping between the Key and failure response from the above

    errorCode - "code": "BAD_REQUEST"

    Status - "status": 400

    correlationID - BLANK

    entityId - BLANK

    entityName - BLANK

    userMessage - "message": "The request could not be understood by the server due to malformed syntax."

    userParamsMessage - BLANK

    userParams.key - BLANK

    userParams.value - BLANK

    details.errorCode- "errorCode": "ACTION.REMOTE_ENDPOINT"

    details.fieldName - BLANK

    details.entityId - BLANK

    details.entityName - BLANK

    How can we retrieve the one which we had underlined above? Is there any way thru which we can modify the contract? I understand Output contract is for success, is there anything for failure too?

    #ArchitectureandDesign #Integrations


    Harsha Shenoy Conn3ct (Connect Managed Services (UK) Limited)



    Jason_Mathison | 2023-04-11 02:18:48 UTC | #2

    Hi Harsha,

    If this is for a voice IVR flow, unfortunately most of the failure response doesn't make it back to architect. The failure response should make it back to other media type flows.

    There is an idea you can vote for to add a "failure template": https://genesyscloud.ideas.aha.io/ideas/INB-I-1498 Feel free to vote for that ticket and add your use case, or create a new idea for supporting the failure path in call flows.

    Out of curiosity, if you were able to return that sample response to your flow, how would use it to find and fix the issue?

    --Jason


    Harsha_Shenoy | 2023-04-14 09:28:13 UTC | #3

    Thanks Jason, yes its for non voice interactions. if we are able to catch the reason for failure (sent by the application to GC via api response), we would be able to find the root cause quickly. I have voted for that Idea, its matches my requirement.


    Jason_Mathison | 2023-04-14 12:40:46 UTC | #4

    My general suggestion for a situation like this would be in the data action failure path record the inputs that you used somehow (Maybe set it in participant data or push it to a data table). Then test out those inputs in the Data Action test mode to figure out what kind of inputs are failing so you can fix the flow logic.

    We recognize that this isn't a great way to approach these issues and are working on some better options.

    --Jason


    system | 2023-05-15 12:41:19 UTC | #5

    This topic was automatically closed 31 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.


    This post was migrated from the old Developer Forum.

    ref: 19176