Thank you for the information and reasons plus what's going forward. I will relate this to our business
Reuben Goodwin
Sr. Telephony Engineer
Reuben.Goodwin@loancare.com | NMLS 2916

SERVICE BEYOND EXPECTATIONS
Visit loancare.com for news and insights.
Original Message:
Sent: 8/28/2025 12:57:00 PM
From: Vidas Placiakis
Subject: RE: Time-Off Statuses
Gene, thank you for taking the time to share a very relevant and well-described use case. From your posts, I understand that one of the key reasons you're not fully automating time-off requests is the current limitation in the granularity of time-off limits-you're looking for something more precise than the current daily-level settings.
While the upcoming 15-minute granularity feature is still in development, the current option is to use manual approval in combination with time-off notes to explain decisions to employees.
At this time, we don't have plans to introduce additional or configurable time-off request statuses. However, once automation is enabled, the conditions you mentioned-such as "no PTO hours available" and "no time-off slots available"-are already reflected through sub-statuses in the system.
In addition, there is a new feature in development that may align with your review workflow:
• The first phase will introduce a new sub-status under Pending, indicating that a request is being held for further review. This will clearly show frontline staff that the request hasn't yet been reviewed.
• The second phase will allow supervisors to manually initiate the approval process for these held requests, in a sequence of their choosing. This could significantly reduce manual tracking and help streamline your approval process.
------------------------------
Vidas Placiakis
Genesys
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 08-28-2025 11:18
From: Gene Gutierrez
Subject: Time-Off Statuses
I like this as an idea; being able to assign these statuses almost like agent statuses.
Denied - No time off slots available
Denied - No PTO hours available
Pending - On waitlist
This would also solve our use-case above.
------------------------------
Gene Gutierrez | Workforce Analyst
Presbyterian Workforce Management
Albuquerque, NM
Original Message:
Sent: 08-28-2025 11:13
From: Reuben Goodwin
Subject: Time-Off Statuses
I think simply our business is wanting to approve or denied with "reasons" and they figure this would be the best way to add additional Request statues
------------------------------
Reuben Goodwin
Sr. Telephony Engineer
Original Message:
Sent: 08-28-2025 10:59
From: Jay Langsford
Subject: Time-Off Statuses
The result of a time off request being reviewed is either the time off request is approved or denied. I am not following about the need of some new Reviewed status that is neither approved/denied.
Pending time off requests might have a waitlist position. I am not sure what you mean by 'having manual access to the waitlist status'. Can you explain that and what exactly you would do with such information? Are you wanting something like you decide which time off requests should be waitlisted and their order in the waitlist manually?
Adding @Damaris Scott to see if on the Product Management side.
------------------------------
Jay Langsford
VP, R&D
Original Message:
Sent: 08-28-2025 10:26
From: Gene Gutierrez
Subject: Time-Off Statuses
In our case, not having manual access to the Waitlist status is disappointing. Due to the platforms' ignorance of existing requests, and the current inability to limit which intervals can have more than one person off, we don't use the auto-approval/Time Off Plans for more than a couple groups so almost all PTO requests are reviewed manually. Having the ability for WFM to select "Waitlist" and/or a "Reviewed" status would be extremely useful for both WFM (so we can show it has been seen before) and the front-line staff (so Supervisors and Agents can confirm WFM has seen and reviewed their request).
------------------------------
Gene Gutierrez | Workforce Analyst
Presbyterian Workforce Management
Albuquerque, NM
Original Message:
Sent: 08-27-2025 08:43
From: Jay Langsford
Subject: Time-Off Statuses
Time off request states are not extensible. How are the current ones (pending, approved, denied, etc.) not sufficient?
------------------------------
Jay Langsford
VP, R&D
Original Message:
Sent: 08-27-2025 08:16
From: Reuben Goodwin
Subject: Time-Off Statuses
Is there a way to add additional Request statuses in the Time-Off Requests under Time Off? 
------------------------------
Reuben Goodwin
Sr. Telephony Engineer
Original Message:
Sent: 08-27-2025 07:48
From: Jay Langsford
Subject: Time-Off Statuses
You can add activity codes under the time off activity code category. E.g., default Time Off; Paid Time Off; FMLA; etc. where you can specify, individually, if they are agent selectable or not, count as paid time or not, is planned or unplanned, etc.
The add activity code API is documented along with our other publicly documented APIs; although, if you just have a few, then I would suggest using the application to add/manage.
------------------------------
Jay Langsford
VP, R&D
Original Message:
Sent: 08-26-2025 10:00
From: Reuben Goodwin
Subject: Time-Off Statuses
Hello All ,
Is there a way to create new Time-Off Request Statueses in Genesys if we wanted to have a more defined option other than the native onces already in the system? Any of the API's will work. Thanks to whoever helps.
#TimeOff,AbsenceManagement
------------------------------
Reuben Goodwin
Sr. Telephony Engineer
------------------------------