A place to ask questions, connect with others, and stay in the know
Okay so here's an example of an idea that I raised that just got marked as will not implement without any communication from a PM, or response to my questions.
Ability to specify one or more supervisors for the new work teams feature and have that then flow through to roles
How many others have ideas that ended up lost in limbo because of this? I've made the suggestion many times to have a report run on those will not implement type statuses vs recent comments as I suspect there's more out there. I'd imagine if a "new" Genesys user joined and saw that they wouldn't bother commenting or voting even if there's actually an ongoing need for the functionality being proposed.
In the case of this idea, why wouldn't it at least get into a discussion? Okay so maybe not leveraging Work Teams for this, but maybe some other group type? Using the reports-to/relationship info? But no, just blindly mark it will not implement and forget it?
If we really want this ideas portal to be of value let's make it work :)
First, let me express my sincerest apology for not including an explanatory note when I closed the idea that you referenced. This was an oversight on my part which I have corrected.
I'd like to assure you that we in Genesys Cloud Product Management value all of our customers' and partners' contributions to the Ideas Portal. We are currently building more structure around our internal processes so to provide more information, transparency, and haste in our responses. Please expect to see marked improvement as we continue to work to make the Ideas Portal valuable to all of us!
Thanks Becky, appreciate the candidness. Would I be correct in assuming certain statuses no longer send comment updates to the PM team though? I guess the catch here is that if something is marked as will not implement, people won't even try to vote for it even if they actually want/need it. What's the criteria that is used to determine how long you wait on voting for?
Hi Vaun, we don't have a specific threshold that we use to determine how long we will wait for voting. In this case, the idea was over a year old and didn't have a single vote - even the original submitter had removed their vote. I took that as a sign that the idea was obsolete. I see that I was mistaken and I do apologize.
I will investigate with our Ops team why it was that I didn't receive your comments after the ticket closed. I do not believe that that should be the case.
Thanks again for sharing your experience - your feedback matters!
Thanks yes, sadly it's a case of removing my own vote from an idea raised so that vote could be used elsewhere but still trying to have the idea itself stay "live" if that makes sense.
I agree with Vaun here with his comments and feedback.I've also got many examples of Idea's 'Will Not Implement' with no responses or explanation why:External Contacts: Add external contacts to main search barhttps://genesyscloud.ideas.aha.io/ideas/DIG-I-78Option to Toggle HTML on Emails in Agent's conversations viewhttps://genesyscloud.ideas.aha.io/ideas/DIG-I-1256Multiple external tags with customized tag nameshttps://genesyscloud.ideas.aha.io/ideas/ANLS-I-117Be able to set a contact to private. (Hidden from directory)https://genesyscloud.ideas.aha.io/ideas/UCC-I-250User Transfer to Architect Flow and return to agenthttps://genesyscloud.ideas.aha.io/ideas/INB-I-123Give agents the ability to control auto-answerhttps://genesyscloud.ideas.aha.io/ideas/OTB-I-182To match the outbound calls phone number format and scheduled call back phone number formathttps://genesyscloud.ideas.aha.io/ideas/OTB-I-263
And then there's these ones that says 'Feature Already Exists' - when it clearly doesn't and even asking for clarification, there's been no response either.Remote monitoring of desktop application and/or web client with remotely triggered diagnosticshttps://genesyscloud.ideas.aha.io/ideas/DIG-I-444Busy Tones on Consult Transfershttps://genesyscloud.ideas.aha.io/ideas/INB-I-406
Regarding Becky's comment about 'even the original submitter had removed their vote' - this is often due to the creator either not having any votes available or has then decided with the limited number of votes available there is something worth more on the vote - even though the idea might still be useful or valuable. Then even when votes aren't 'released' from ideas in 'Will Not Implement' or 'Not Currently Planned' - do I keep my limited votes allocated to these seeming 'dead' ideas to show I'm still interested even despite the status, or remove them and just give up on the idea.
Even when there are highly voted ideas been in 'Community Feedback Requested' for 2+ years. E.g. the Genesys Go Mobile app created 5 years ago with 425 votes - a admin comment in April says "we need to allow the community a bit more time to vote and comment" - how much more time and voting is needed to prove this is popular?
I don't think I could hit the like button enough times on this topic (again).
I am one of those people who have basically given up on the Ideas Board. There are ideas that have a status change (especially to will not implement) without explanation, ideas that are implemented with little to no votes and other ideas that have a ton of votes just sit and age, ideas where people ask for an update and get no response, ideas that say they are completed or merged with other ideas, but they do not meet the original requirement of the request, etc. and all of this is absolutely infuriating. Every couple of months someone makes a post like this, and we get the "we hear you and we are making changes", but it just continues to happen.
When an idea is submitted, it should be reviewed by Genesys and be assigned an owner. That owner should post their interpretation of the request to ensure everyone has the same understanding of the issue/request. Then the owner should be responsible for updating the idea (at a minimum) once a quarter. If the status of an idea changes at any point, it should be required that an explanation is given as to why it was changed.
100% in agreement with you. I can't remember the last time I submitted anything for the same reasons given here.Additionally, I see where there are overlapping ideas that could be consolidated to gather more votes, then when ready to consider for moving up in the queue, asking more questions to sort out the sub points and get to the root functionality being requested by all.I just dealt with a new Genesys customer who gave up on the entire Ideas board because one of their burning issues was split up across multiple ideas, though one of them had 400+ votes (If I remember correctly.) "What's the use?" was their response.
Thanks for adding in here Jeff. I also notice at least one on your list went from Accepted to will not implement without any admin/PM comment at all even after an initial comment confirming they are planning to do it.
Is it possible to create a separate forum maybe here where you (Genesys) can openly post and ask for constructive feedback on improving the ideas portal? You'll see from this thread and others like it there's a few thoughts out there on how it could be improved. It will also be good if maybe Genesys could put openly into that same forum what they're doing behind the scenes to improve this :)
------------------------------Becky PowellDirector, Product ManagementGenesys - EmployeesOriginal Message:Sent: 11-28-2023 15:09From: Vaun McCarthySubject: So here's one example of an idea raised that PMs give no feedback or responses on - months later still waiting
Excellent idea, Vaun! I will raise this with our product leadership team!
------------------------------Vaun McCarthyOriginal Message:Sent: 11-28-2023 15:43From: Becky PowellSubject: So here's one example of an idea raised that PMs give no feedback or responses on - months later still waiting
How many others have ideas that ended up lost in limbo because of this? I've made the suggestion many times to have a report run on those will not implement typ